Thursday, March 29, 2007
Mitt Romney lists Jeb Bush as possible running mate
Not sure what I think, but this is either a great move or a death knell to Romney.
Romney Lists Potential Running Mates (Forbes)
Bush carries the Bush name, which I think is, politically, unfortunate. Many people have turned against George W., and would not hesitate to fry Jeb. This includes Republicans.
Whether Jeb is such a liability, though, given the current not-so-conservative crop of Republicans, is hard to say. This could focus every conservative on the Romney campaign.
It is the kind of organization and teamwork Republicans are famous for, and Democrats sorely wish they had.
Also, it could give Jeb a national light, and if a Democrat wins in 2008, set him up for a winnable campaign in 2012. He would have four years, plus this campaign, to show why he is like George W, but only in the good ways, and his own man in the ways the anti-GW cult worships.
If the Democrats do well in the White House, Jeb, of course, can't win. With the edge of a Democrat downbeat at election time, in 2012, it might be a third Bush in the White House.
The Republicans know for 2008, they are the underdog. With many Republican candidates sounding more like Democrats than Democrats, they need a strategy to distinguish themselves.
The ball is in the hands of Democrats, but it is wobbly. As popular as Hillary Clinton is, with Barack Obama generating a lot of news, they also have been biting each other's back. Enough mud-slinging amongst themselves, and we will have President Romney. No one wants a president who fosters anger.
Will the public go for it? What do you think? Who represents the perfect pairing for each party?
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
President Bush's Statement on Tony Snow's Cancer Recurrence
President Bush's Statement on Tony Snow's Cancer Recurrence
Rose Garden
10:54 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: This morning I got a phone call from Tony Snow. He called me from the hospital. He told me that when they went in and operated on him they found cancer. It's a recurrence of the cancer that he thought that he had successfully dealt with in the past. His attitude is, one, that he is not going to let this whip him, and he's upbeat. My attitude is, is that we need to pray for him, and for his family.
Obviously, a lot of folks here in the White House worry a lot about their friend, as do Laura and I. And so my message to Tony is, stay strong; a lot of people love you and care for you and will pray for you. And we're hoping for all the best. I'm looking forward to the day that he comes back to the White House and briefs the press corps on the decisions that I'm making and why I'm making them. In the meantime, I hope our fellow citizens offer a prayer to he and his family.
Thank you.
END 10:55 A.M. EDT
Monday, March 26, 2007
Hillary Gets Blogged: Good, Bad & OMG
What does matter is the brilliant pro-Hillary result the 1984 video has had. Someone in the Obama camp beat up on a girl. Not that Hillary is unable to defend herself, but that's what happened.
Meanwhile, even though at election time, the YouTube video itself will mean nothing, the issues are being ignored. This allows more strategy time for all parties. It provides a reprieve for Hillary Clinton's people, and gives a break to the anti-war folks.
A few have enjoyed using profanity. but, again, that's MySpace talk, not serious political dialoging.
Let me encourage you to look through these, and comment on them. Not just here, but on their blogs.
Hillary in 5th Place Among DFA Democrats
Hillary Clinton's Free Commercial On GMA
Hillary says she "learned a lot."
Was Hillary Duff's Band Actually Playing On GMA This Morning?
Singles
HILLARY CLINTON SEEKS TO STOP INCREASE IN EDWARDS POLL NUMBERS ...
HILLARY CLINTON APPEARANCE AT CIVIL RIGHTS MEMORIAL SERVICE IN ...
American Research Poll
HILLARY IN HOLLYWOOD HIT: $2.6M FUNDRAISER OUTPACE...
Candidate: Hillary Clinton
John Edwards' blogornauts lack vision on Hillary 1984, Part 2
John Edwards' blogornauts lack vision on Hillary 1984, Part 1
Hillary 1984 Creator identified, Resigned ... Uh, fired!
Hillary Clinton Tries to Show She's Got the Balls
Hillary 1984
Hillary Clinton to Secret Service Detail: "Get F*cked!"
Our response to the Obama 1984 ad
Hillary Clinton, 198.... err... 2008
Lasky Endorses Hillary
Vilsack to Endorse Hillary
President Hillary Clinton: The Great Dictator?
Hillary Clinton '1984' Video Send-Up: "Big Sister Is Watching You"
The Impact of "Hillary 1984"
1984 apple Ad spoofed vs Hillary clinton vs Obama
Hillary Clinton in Houston on Saturday!
Vilsack Endorses Hillary, Surprises No One
Barack Obama Denies Campaign Ties to Anti-Hillary Clinton YouTube Ad
Vilsack to Endorse Hillary
MORE STRAY THOUGHTS ABOUT THE HILLARY AD One rea...
Who likes Hillary?
Designer of the Hillary "Big Brother" Ad Fired
The people speak — to Hillary
Vilsack Expected to Curse Hillary’s Campaign
Vilsack Backs Hillary
'Hillary 1984'
Dick Morris Still Obsessive-Compulsive Re: Hillary...
Hillary pt. 2 (Liabilities)
Morris Says It's Hillary, Rudy and Maybe Bloomberg
Continuing the Conversation with Hillary
Pro-Obama anti-Hillary ad
Just Say No To ATM Hillary
The Hillary "1984" ad.
hillary 2008
1984 Look, I'm not supporting Hillary Clinton in t...
So that's why Hillary likes it!
Hillary As “Big Brother.”
Ohio, Philip De Vellis And Anti-Hillary Ad: A Step Close To Obama?
Hey, Hillary. Remind me why I'm supposed to go to the mat for you ...
Tough question
Hillary; 1984 Apple ad; Big Sister; Obama; Vote Different; Phillip ...
Edwards stays in
This is the 1984 version of Hillary Clinton's Presidency Bid
The Now Ubiquitous 'Hillary-1984' Ad Watches Over Us
"VOTE SMART: a warning to all women about hillary clinton" someone ...
I'm Hillary...Vote For Me...I'm Your Bitch!
Is Hillary Clinton Really Big Sister?
More on the Hillary/Obama ads
Here's the latest Hillary video...
Hillary Meets Orwell With Surprising Resonance
Sayet v. Hillary
Hillary finishes fifth in Dem Poll
Memo To Hillary Clinton: The Truth Shall Set You Free
Obama's Religion: Just in from Professor Kim
Hillary's Hacktacularness
Hillary Clinton's Anti-Gun Agenda
In Iowa, Clinton Calls for Repeal
Hillary vs. Obama: Some bloggers naive, some devious
So...what's the big deal about the 1984 Hillary Video?
Hillary in 1984
Obama's press secretary lived with "Hillary 1984" ad creator
Creator of Hillary 1984 Ad identified
Hillary Clinton...MrsSatan ...um... Auntie Remus!
Another reason not to support Hillary
The Moonie Media and Hillary: The Chickens are Com...
Hillary Clinton: Brought to You by Corporate America
Hillary Clinton visits a school
On Not Voting For Hillary
The problem with Hillary.
Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy
Cenk Uygur On Hillary Clinton's Failure To Lead
Anti-Clinton, Anti-Obama Videos: The YouTube Generation Gets Political
Hillary Clinton Leads Pack
Hillary
Giuliani Notes: Rudy Beating Hillary by 8 Points
2008: Hillary vs McCain?
Hillary Clinton knows all about sacking US Attorneys
Props to Arianna for Outing the Author of Hillary 1984 Mashup
Vote for Hillary. She's a woman like you: Divisive?
Politics Tuesday - Hillary Clinton
Hillary makes it official
Hillary Arrives!!
Bill: Quit Picking on Hillary Over Iraq Vote
Hillary: "We Need A Diplomat"
Hillary caught re-creating her biography yet again
Hillary Clinton's Accent
What Does She Really Think?
Original Apple Macintosh 1984 Commercial
YouTube Barack Obama-affiliated anti-Hillary Clinton 1984 video
Macintosh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Buy Apple stuff from Amazon
YouTube Barack Obama-affiliated anti-Hillary Clinton 1984 video
I doubt Obama engineered this, but, as we learned with the John Edwards campaign, sometimes leaders are fools when it comes to hiring people with integrity. Edwards, as you recall, hired some people who hate Catholics, and said so on their blogs. And, we also know mudslinging is part of both Hillary's and Obama's campaign strategy.
Politics as usual.
Buy Apple stuff from Amazon
Friday, March 23, 2007
Sickness in Politics
John Edwards' campaign might be in jeopardy, but hopefully his wife's cancer will go into remission.
Likewise Bush spokesman Snow to undergo abdominal surgery "to remove a small growth in his lower abdomen". Tony Snow's situation is less serious, but still hardly just the sniffles.
We wish them both good health.
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Rules for Political Campaigns: Smear or Be Smeared (Smear Anyway)
- Smear your opponent.
- Blame your opponent for smearing you.
- Suggest your opponent is unworthy due to past activities.
- Blame rich people for fighting you.
- Ask rich people for money.
- More money is better; keep asking.
- Have expensive fundraisers to talk about poor who can't attend fundraiser.
- Claim religious superiority over opponent.
- Blame religion for all the world troubles.
- Attend church for a photo opp on Sunday.
- Point fingers at Christians as intolerant.
- Act intolerantly toward Christians.
- Court races you otherwise never spend time with.
- Tolerate comedians lampooning your opponent.
- Complain when comedians make you look like Big Brother on YouTube.
- Wash, rinse, repeat.
Search Google Video for Hillary Clinton YouTube videos.
Saturday, March 17, 2007
President's Radio Address - President Bush Addresses Defense & Democrats' Position
The purpose of this legislation should be to give our troops on the front lines the resources, funds, and equipment they need to fight our enemies. Unfortunately, some in Congress are using this bill as an opportunity to micromanage our military commanders, force a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq, and spend billions on domestic projects that have nothing to do with the war on terror.
Our troops urgently need Congress to approve emergency war funds. Over the past several weeks, our Nation has begun pursuing a new strategy in Iraq. Under the leadership of General David Petraeus, our troops have launched a difficult and dangerous mission to help Iraqis secure their capital. This plan is still in its early stages, yet we're already seeing signs of progress. Iraqi and American troops have rounded up more than 700 people affiliated with Shia extremists. They've also launched aggressive operations against Sunni extremists. And they've uncovered large caches of weapons that could have been used to kill our troops. These are hopeful signs. As these operations unfold, they will help the Iraqi government stabilize the country, rebuild the economy, and advance the work of political reconciliation. Yet the bill Congress is considering would undermine General Petraeus and the troops under his command just as these critical security operations are getting under way.
First, the bill would impose arbitrary and restrictive conditions on the use of war funds and require the withdrawal of forces by the end of this year if these conditions are not met. These restrictions would handcuff our generals in the field by denying them the flexibility they need to adjust their operations to the changing situation on the ground. And these restrictions would substitute the mandates of Congress for the considered judgment of our military commanders.
Even if every condition required by this bill was met, all American forces -- except for very limited purposes -- would still be required to withdraw next year, regardless of the situation in Iraq. The consequences of imposing such an artificial timetable would be disastrous.
Here is what Secretary of Defense Robert Gates recently told Congress: Setting a fixed date to withdraw would "essentially tell [the enemy] how long they would have to wait until we're gone." If American forces were to step back from Baghdad before it is more secure, the scale and scope of attacks would increase and intensify. A contagion of violence could spill out across the entire country, and in time, this violence would engulf the region. The enemy would emerge from the chaos emboldened with new safe havens, new recruits, new resources, and an even greater determination to harm America. Such an outcome would be a nightmare for our country.
Second, the bill would cut funding for the Iraqi security forces if Iraqi leaders did not meet rigid conditions set by Congress. This makes no sense. Members of Congress have often said that the Iraqis must step forward and take more responsibility for their own security -- and I agree. Yet Members of Congress can't have it both ways: They can't say that the Iraqis must do more and then take away the funds that will help them do so. Iraq is a young democracy that is fighting for its survival in a region that is vital to American security. To cut off support for their security forces at this critical moment would put our own security at risk.
Third, the bill would add billions of dollars in domestic spending that is completely unrelated to the war. For example, the House bill would provide $74 million for peanut storage, $48 million for the Farm Service Agency, and $35 million for NASA. These programs do not belong in an emergency war spending bill. Congress must not allow debate on domestic spending to delay funds for our troops on the front lines. And Members should not use funding our troops as leverage to pass special interest spending for their districts.
We are a Nation at war, and the heaviest responsibilities fall to our troops in the field. Yet we in Washington have responsibilities, as well. General Petraeus was confirmed by the Senate without a single vote in opposition, and he and his troops need these resources to succeed in their mission. Many in Congress say they support the troops, and I believe them. Now they have a chance to show that support in deed, as well as in word. Congress needs to approve emergency funding for our troops, without strings and without delay. If they send me a bill that does otherwise, I will veto it.
Thank you for listening.
END
source: WhiteHouse.gov
Download a video from Amazon.com
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Right-Wingers Accused By Hillary Clinton of Having Issues With Her - Conspiracy Tales Abound
Consider the situation:
Bill's accused of an affair while in office. The Republicans were then considered the family party (this is before it was figured out that there was a wife-ditch divorce bonanza in the GOP). Here was a great opportunity to do a few things --
- Gain support among pro-family and other moral conservatives
- Decrease interest in the Clinton brand
- Deflect awareness of anything controversial the GOP wanted to push
- Gear up for what became the Bush Dynasty
Calling what was no conspiracy was, in itself, though, conspiracy talk by the Democrats. It is a term (conspiracy) that builds fear among voters.
Additionally, what the conservatives are doing is no different than the campaign efforts done by each party. The language being used in speeches is not generated randomly, but through marketing efforts. Blacks are subjected to it by the Democrats. Evangelical Christians get it from the Republicans. Each demographic becomes insulted and manipulated (to be black, you must not vote Republican; to be Christian, you must not vote Democrat).
Is the Walter Reed fiasco conveniently happening now, allowing the Republican campaign to be disrupted? Maybe. Just like the Clinton extra-marital affair, though, those accused are apparently guilty of that which they are charged.
The moral of the story? Live beyond reproach.
If you walk into a bar, no matter whether you are a teetotaler or a drunk, people will presume you drank. If that's OK with you, walk on in. Otherwise, stay home. Bill took the risk of a little hanky-panky with Monica Lewinsky, and his party paid for it. The gang heading up the Walter Reed Army Hospital is talking heat now.
Clinton revives 'right-wing conspiracy' term
More on Clinton
Monday, March 12, 2007
They're All Bums
- Hillary not admitting she was wrong about Iraq
- George thinking he was right about everything
- Rudy's been through women than men on Craig's List, and only a few less than Bill Clinton
- Newt thinking he's righteous (if you don't count the affairs)
- Barack thinking he's hip
- McCain thinking he's Republican (except, sort of, on certain certain days, when he's independent)
- Kerry thinking he matters ("I'm not Bush")
- Edwards thinking he's Jesus, but hires Catholic bashers
(Just posted this on Craig's List, and thought it deserved to be here.)
Buy Some Election Trinkets, Or Browse Other Sites
Hillary Clinton Store (also Bush stuff)
Hillary Clinton Store in the UK (Bush stuff too)
Would Hillary Support Danish Cartoon Freedom?
Anna Nicole Smith 1967 - 2007: A fan site
Diary of a Newspaper Hawk: An Everyman's View
Rubik's Cube: Get Your Nerd On