Executive Speechwriting: Corporate, Weddings, Retirement

Showing posts with label John Kerry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Kerry. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Barack Obama, a Liberal Man's George W Bush: A cowboy without a hat, he wears a mitre.

POPE HAT VELOURConstitutional expert and definer Barack Obama, America's current president, is moving forward with speed toward his health care initiative. It is, of course, his Iraq War. Just as cowboy George pushed the Iraq War on a a public which did not exactly understand, Barack is pushing the health care project.

Just like Iraq, a real threat is before us. With Iraq, we looked at terrorism, now vanquished thanks to Barack's excellent negotiating skills. We were scared and stupid. "Crucify them!" we cried, trading the Barabbas of Truth for the Christ of the Middle East. And crucify them we did, not matter how innocent they were. But thankfully, Barack was chosen by the college of blue birds. With the signal of blue smoke, they announced his elevation, and now, troubles no more. Can I hear a sweet amen from his pews?

Here we are now with another looming disaster, but Barack is here, thank God. He has seen their corruption, their malfeasance, their evil. With health care in disarray, ready to topple Washington DC, a new cowboy has ridden into town. Like George W. Bush, he does not need to work bilaterally, but has an agenda that American must have, lest in fall to the the health terrorist. Free markets have gone on long enough, and need wrangling and slaughtering.

As the Constitution so clearly demands, health care is the right of all, Father B as we lovingly like to think of him, has touched this and is healing America. The Constitution declares: Life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness and health care to be provided by the people for the people at the expense of the people. A tear in my eye is welling up. Please. I need a moment to salute those blessed words as I type.

Rev. George only looked at Iraq. He, never now to become Pope, did not know what to do with health care. His priorities were short-sighted, incapable of caring for his flock. As such, he only served eight years in office, having been merely elected and not chosen.

In St. Washington's Basilca, Father B. speaks from the chair, and has said that he will do whatever is necessary to ensure health care. The Republicans, or as he refers to them, "separated brethren," will deter him no longer. He is working now to institute Slaughter House Rules (Mother Pelosi is assisting), which will assist him in pushing bills not even the great John Kerry dreamed of in the Crusades of 2004.

Tears run still from my eyes. I know now my sins of trusting the corporate insurance companies. How did I dare think they were good? Why did I let them exist? Why did our forefathers miss the inalienable right of health care? Roosevelt? Truman? Dear lords, how, how, how!

George W., you have failed us, though, like your predecessors, you were only human. Repent, and thank God with us that Father B. is here to hear our prayers.

Buy your own POPE HAT VELOUR.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Jay Leno Plays the Straight Man, Barack Obama Does Not

In these days of manipulative media, from Rush Limbaugh to Jon Stewart, one thing is sure: If you want to be liked, you need to get on a talk show.

As some scrutiny finally kicks in by more serious media, Barack Obama campaigns on Jay Leno's show. Almost as good as Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan, both masters of mugging the camera, we are seeing a new side of Obama: Love me tender.

Viewers might remark how much they love Obama, or are finding their love renewed. Drool? Droll? Either way, funnyman Jay Leno was clearly the straight man here tonight. He bent over backwards to appeal to Obama.

To Obama's credit, he is likable. John McCain lost the election, aside from Republican-hate and/or legitimately different views, because he was not as good looking or charismatic. It was Nixon vs Kennedy all over again. And Obama is smooth on camera. He has that cigarette commercial flair.

When the gloves finally come off, and intelligent deconstructions of what Obama is doing finally are not considered 'hating on my man', it will be interesting. When ObamaLove (t-shirts) moves to maturity, and his unified splendor runs cold (different t-shirt), what will have happened? A better economy? Freedom for Iraqis and the end of a war? Let's hope so.

How long before Obama's millions of lovers chase another man, and President Obama can get down to being president? He's bogged down by all of this, as necessary politically as it is. It could be worse, but John Kerry (who is much less funny) quit early.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Ted Kennedy Faces Brain Cancer and Grim Future

Democrat Ted Kennedy has brain cancer. Malignant and fatal, it looks like he will be dead within five years.

As a Kennedy, and with that, great wealth, he can afford the best treatment available, but it is no less serious. There is no cure. Just the same, we can only wish him the best of health these remaining days.

What is next for him? No doubt, he is in shock, and unsure. He is 76.

The Kennedy era, filled with scandal, death, money, and power, will soon end. No heir to their dynasty truly exists. From his brother's (President John F Kennedy) murder, to his other brother's (Robert Kennedy) murder, to his own trouble with the death of Mary Jo Kopechne in his car (the infamous Chappaquiddick incident), tragedy has surrounded his family.

Eloquent and influential, Kennedy has served as a leader among Democrats since the early 1960s.

His presidential endorsements have not gone well. In 1988 he supported Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis to win the nomination. In 1992, he backed former fellow Massachusetts Senator Paul Tsongas. In 2000, he backed Vice President Al Gore. In 2004, it was Massachusetts Senator John Kerry.

Currently Kennedy is supporting Illinois Senator Barack Obama, his best shot recently in picking a winner. This was a key endorsement, which, no doubt, impacted Hillary Clinton's chance of securing the Democratic nomination.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

If USA Is Attacked, John McCain Wins

Would an attack relatively close to the US Presidential Election in November ensure John McCain is elected?

Do Americans really have the confidence that either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama are well-equipped with both conviction and skill-set to extract us from Iraq, and protect us here stateside?

While it appears we Americans are disinclined toward being in Iraq, we felt as we felt before 2004 as well, and yet elected George W Bush for a second term with record popular votes.

This is not 2004, and wannabe John Kerry cannot be compared to today's Democratic candidates. He misses the charm of Obama and the experience of Clinton.

And, also important, McCain is not as hated as Bush. McCain misses the personal, evil bitterness that many Democrats feel against Bush, but he also misses the easy-going "Let's get the bad guys," swagger our current president enjoys. McCain is harder to hate, and harder to love.

Where will it land?
As Al Qaeda pretends that they care about Muhammad (there is no peace upon him), or his teachings, and wipe their sacrilegious excrement across the world, they threaten Western Europe. Europe will barely be noticed by the USA, but the smallest burp in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania will be returned with the fastest six guns in the western world.

See what CNN is saying.

Al Qaeda No. 2: Attacks on Western nations in works
CNN
CAIRO, Egypt (AP) -- Al Qaeda still has plans to target Western countries involved in the Iraq war, Osama bin Laden's chief deputy warns in an audiotape released Tuesday to answer questions posed by followers.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Who Do We Like Least? Democrats Vie for Public Distaste

Who Loves You, Baby?

No one.


It used to be a well-appreciated fact: America hates Bush. Besides, with the Republicans controlling Congress, there was plenty for a Democrat to hate.

That's now trouble. As it seems, given the opportunity, Democrats are very disliked too. They are running Congress now. After much celebration with the more liberal side of the Democratic Party stepping in under Nancy Pelosi, it looked as if Democrats were as popular as the late Ronald Reagan. Not so.
The survey shows Bush's approval ratings at 35 percent, and Congress' even lower, 25 percent. Only 27 percent of those polled said the country is headed in the right direction, and 39 percent said they support the Iraq war, with 58 percent opposed.
That's what it says in an AP piece posted on Yahoo.

No wonder George Bush seemed almost happy when she took office. Congress would make him look good. Who woulda thunk?

What are we supposed to do with that? We love to blame, but we don't know who to blame.

Where this leaves the presidential candidates is the need to push hope. Bill Clinton and Reagan were masters of this. Bush, both, were masters at promoting security, but feeble when it came to hope.

When election times comes, if we dislike everybody in theory (do we really hate Congress that much, or are we just tired of their reputation of giving themselves raises in troubled times, as ethics scandals creep out?) -- will anyone show up to vote? If we are left with a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" attitude, ambivalence will follow, finished off by ignoring the whole election.

We need hope. Real hope, not marketed garbage that is the product of a PR campaign. We need to believe in substance. George W Bush, for all his foibles, is a man of conviction. We need that character in office, with convictions we agree with, we can trust. Kerry lost because we never trusted he had any convictions. John Edwards, to a less degree, seems as wishy-washy (though he is committed to good hair, and is willing to invest in it).

As hope-mongers go, Barack Obama is in better shape, for now, than Hillary Clinton. She's working on this. Obama is simply more stable in his presentation. He feels believable, like a father figure. Reagan was a tough cowboy grandfather, but Obama is softer. He's not exactly Mike Brady of the Brady Bunch, but he carries himself with an academic certainty.

Among the Republicans? Hope is an easier sell for them to their followers. Republican voters tend to look at life and politics more optimistically. However, the Democrats are doing their best to chip away at it.

With Mitt Romney, the Democrats, and even Planned Parenthood is trying to say he's not prochoice and has changed his vote. Prolife Republicans are responding, "Atta boy!" much to the Democrat's chagrin. Rudy Giuliani has divorced to often to feel like a hopeful guy. He's humorous, but not hopeful. Fred Thompson, the jury is still out, but he could play that tenor. John McCain is dead in the water, and was nothing but an interview expert on TV talk shows.

When we all line up to vote, who is still arouning kissing babies is yet to be seen. This much we know, we probably don't like them.

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Hillary versus Rudy: Battle of the Complexes

The question came up, "If Hillary Clinton ran against Rudy Giuliani, who would win?"

No, this isn't celebrity boxing. Rudy's ex-wives could beat up Hillary. He has, what, three of them?

And this isn't battle of the sexes. Rudy's a man too.

John Kerry. Remember him? Not many do. He was the guy back in 2004 who ran against George W Bush. Bush was saluted with a record number of popular votes, trouncing the hapless Kerry. Some of those who voted for Kerry really were not Kerry supporters, but hated Bush with more passion than a KKK member. So, Kerry had his political butt handed to him on a platter.

Rudy Giuliani does not want to be John Kerry.

What? Rudy is a Republican. Kerry is a Democrat.

Right. Where they are similar is that Hillary Clinton's supporters are pro-Hillary. Rudy's will include a large batch of anti-Hillary supporters. Kerry's campaign was set on shifting sand, "Anyone but Bush." If Rudy rides the waves of "Anyone but Hillary," then he'll land on the sand just to be swept away.

Rudy's other problem is Barack Obama. As noted in an early post (Barack Obama is not a Pacifist (so what?)), Obama's not against military intervention against terrorism. One of Rudy's selling points, like the floundering John McCain's, is his commitment to putting down al Qaeda. Now, Obama's on cue, making sure his supporters know he's not exactly pro-war, but that he'll do what it takes. This will not steal away all of Rudy's supporters, but it will grab a few liberals that want an anti-terrorist candidate. Rudy isn't exactly a moral conservative, being called a champion of gay rights and supporter of abortion.

See: Political positions of Rudy Giuliani - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).
Michael Long, chairman of the New York state Conservative Party of New York stated, "The gay marriage issue draws a line down the middle of the street, and Rudy Giuliani is something of a champion of gay rights."
Pro-Iraq, anti-abortion, anti-gay marriage conservatives might jump the morally ambiguous Republican Party and vote third party. I can see Ron Paul (see Ron Paul for President) landing as such a candidate. The third party candidate might pull a Ross Perot, stealing enough votes from the Republican presidential candidate to put Rudy under the Brooklyn Bridge.

If Hillary's snags Barack Obama as her running mate, and the race is against Rudy Giuliani (running mate unknown), at this moment (I have waffled immensely), it could be a landslide. Rudy does not have the moral differentiation, nor the completeness of difference regarding war, that he once appeared to have.

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Why John Kerry Needed Bill Clinton: A Look at the Desperate Campaign Maneuvers by Occasional Senator John Kerry

Below - this concerned Kerry's nonelection efforts in 2004, and his most brilliant, but unsuccessful move, engaging Bill Clinton to help build him up. Will Hillary Clinton do likwise in her bid against Barack Obama? Democrat vs Democrat, in 2008, will be a very different race, and Bill is in a tight spot.

Why John Kerry Needed Bill Clinton
A Look at the Desperate Campaign Maneuvers by Occasional Senator John Kerry

Bill Clinton is one of this country's best orators. He is warm, engaging, with all the charm of a Southern Baptist minister. Few people, as with Ronald Reagan, do not like Bill Clinton, even when they vehemently disagree with Clinton's policies.

John Kerry is one of the driest speakers ever to read an index card at a campaign rally. Few people, as with Gerald Ford, have any warm feelings about John Kerry, even when they passionately agree with him.

John Kerry knows he failed to excite his supporters in his debates with President Bush. Against one of the most speech-shy presidents ever, John Kerry not only failed to slam-dunk the debates, but in the third debate, he lost. The difference was at most a technical victory, but Kerry should have owned the debate. He thought it would be easy, but he forgot that George Bush supporters chose him not because he was a pulpit queen, but because he stands up for what he believes. Kerry thinks he does too, but his credibility here has never been established.

Bill Clinton brings authenticity to the liberal viewpoint. He has a way of bringing on board people even after his notorious affair with the then very young Monica Lewinsky. Kerry recognizes his own inadequacy here. He never has capitalized on his own strengths, and has not been able to lead those being polled into confidence in his campaign.

Even after all the polemic pumping up by Michael Moore, the relative silence of presidential coattailer, Hillary Clinton, and the misguided CBS memo fiasco, Kerry has all but lost the anybody-but-Bush crowd. Democrats are demanding he speak to real issues, and are discovering he is not as well-planned as he led them to believe.

Bill Clinton can persuade Kerry's audience that a vote for Kerry is a vote for Clinton. He'll never say that, but Kerry campaign managers are hoping this Pied Piper technique will work on weaker minded voters. Kerry will continue to aim at academics who are already putty in his hand. Not everything Kerry does is ineffective.

Clinton can also raise money. He smiles, and it is ka-ching. The dollars will pour from sympathetic wallets who believe Clinton's presidency will continue through the ghost of Kerry. The problem they will encounter is the ghost is real, and the smoky candidate Kerry can offer is nothing but fumes should he actually be elected.

In religious matters, George W Bush has worn his faith openly, and few question his sincere belief in Christ. Some people shudder to know he bases some decisions on values which come from his faith, but those same people believe him when he says he believes. Kerry has the opposite problem. His claim of a Catholic faith seems politically convenient. When he quotes Scripture or "Amazing Grace," the praiseful lament of a former slave trader, he sounds like he memorized it on the bus. He wants to play the religion card, but has discovered that claiming to have a faith that doesn't influence him is impossible.

In comes Bill Clinton, a master of the game. His faith sounds sincere, and for all intents and purposes, most likely is. With his fall during the Lewinsky scandal, he sought advice of major Christian leaders. Was he contrite? Ask God. His views on abortion and homosexual politics worked contrary to his stated faith, but many in the Bible-belt south still voted for him. How Clinton did this is what Kerry wants to know, and when Kerry and Clinton stand at the same podium, the lesson can be taught.

Clinton soundly beat George Bush, the father of the current president by building a message of fear into the middle of the road voters with his, "It's the economy stupid" mantra. Father Bush never responded, but laid down flat and was walked over. Kerry is hoping that the figure of Clinton will confuse enough voters with these memories.

The race, as I write in early November 2004, is so close that pollsters themselves are shaking their heads. Back when Senator John Kerry used to go to Washington to serve as a senator, he was too busy to campaign. Now, as George W. Bush runs for office, Kerry is desperate. Even though Bush is constantly in meetings, working on things to protect and improve our country, Kerry can't gain an edge. Abandoning his office during this campaign has not been enough. He still needs to bring in the image of hardworking Bill Clinton.

Kerry has never succeeded in moving past his divorce from first wife Julia Thorne, his fabulously wealthy new wife (heir to the Heinz fortune), and his rambling academic manner. He knows George Bush, as a runner and former owner of a baseball team, is a paragon of health and outdoor sensibilities. In response, Kerry had a photo op of him carrying a gun with a dead goose in his hand. This was turned against him when some of his supporters who hate hunting and large guns heard about this unnecessary gimmick. They supported him when he said was antiwar, but are now confused as he proves he loves goose killing. They see a man hiding one gun behindback while pointing the other at an animal. Even the presumption that most independents would tail Kerry has not worked out. A recent Reuters poll shows Bush with a 12% lead over Kerry among independents.

John Kerry turns now to the big guns of Bill Clinton. Clinton, despite his Oxford laurels, always came across legitimately as a good old boy. He ate at fast food places, came from a small town, and came from a single parent family. People believe him, and relate to him.

In the end, John Kerry has not been himself. He has been everything but himself, relying, finally, on Bill Clinton. How will this gambit turn out? Ask Michael Dukakis.

* Moments ago, John Kerry conceded the election to George W. Bush, the President of the United States of America.

** Post note, September 2005: While there is much noise among Democrats about Bush, it should be noted that a record number of Americans voted for Bush. The real trouble remaining is not George W Bush, but the Democrats inability to present a better, more believable candidate.

by Anthony Trendl
editor of http://www.hungarianbookstore.com